|
|
Adjust
Text Size

For Immediate Release
March 3, 2010
Contact: Tim Hennessey
(717) 787-3110
Letter to the Editor
by Senator Bob Mensch
State Budget Redux
On February 9th Governor Rendell delivered his 8th, and final, budget, and
not surprisingly the greatest applause during the speech was for his statement
to have the budget finished by June 30th. It's not surprising this comment
would be met positively, after all last year was painful and caused a lot of
financial difficulty for Pennsylvanians.
But when I'm asked if I think the budget will be done on time this year, my
response is a skeptical, "I doubt it". The newly proposed budget is, in my
opinion, not affordable, not sustainable, and must be rejected by the taxpayers
and the legislature—but more on that in a moment.
First, let's look at history. We have not had a budget completed on time in
any of the past 7 years—but that has not always been true. To find the next
most recent budget that was not completed on time, you have to go back through
many administrations, to I believe, Governor Shafer. So past performance by
this administration is not encouraging. And when we take a closer look at last
year's budget mess, you will realize that the House majority leadership
(Democrat) did not even put a budget in front of the House until July 13th.
That's right, despite the Constitutional requirement for a balanced budget to be
completed by June 30th, the House majority leadership decided to ignore the
Constitution and do what they wanted.
More importantly, last year's budget was unaffordable, just as this year's
budget is unaffordable, so there is a great probability there will be another
"battle". Some residents just want us all to go along and agree, but had we
done so last year we'd have higher taxes this year, and we'd have even worse
spending that we can't afford. Many residents may not realize that February
2010 is the 24th consecutive month of negative revenue collections by our
state. As a Commonwealth we have not been able to meet our spending obligations
for 2 solid years. Yet this year's proposed budget has a further spending
increase of $1.155 Billion, and it includes 2 very significant tax increases—a
sales tax increased designed to raise $1 Billion or more; and an onerous
business tax strategy that will chase more jobs out of PA. We can't afford the
increased spending. We can't afford to pay more in sales taxes. We can't
afford to lose any more jobs from PA. So when someone suggests there is
disagreement about this year's budget, instead of someone asking why we can't
all just agree, the question should be, "why must Governor Rendell's
administration insist we need to spend more than we can afford?"
The sales tax proposal will hurt our seniors with new taxes on medical and
pharmaceutical services. We'll all pay more for financial and legal services.
We'll all pay new taxes on 74 new categories of items to be taxed—we can't
afford it.
Our businesses will be further stressed for providing jobs. PA is already
the 44th lowest state in new job creation. The solution offered by the Rendell
administration is to "close the Delaware loophole", which is actually a tax
increase. The easier solution is just lower our corporate tax rates to be
competitive with other states –we presently have the highest rate in the
nation-and then our businesses won't feel the need to incorporate in Delaware.
But the strategy offered in the budget is actually a tax increase so don't look
for a lot of compromise on corporate net income tax.
I welcome any comments regarding these thoughts. Call me at 215.529.1215; or
write me at
bmensch@pasen.gov.
Sincerely,
Bob Mensch, State Senator
24th District
Bucks, Lehigh, Montgomery and Northampton Counties |